Unlimited core, paid workflow
Tally offers unlimited forms and submissions under fair use, with paid plans at $24 and $74 per month. Fider offers unlimited feedback and members, with a $25 monthly Pro plan for moderation and SEO indexing. Both give away the main job and charge for what larger or more professional users need. Editorial inference: this works when the free product spreads itself—public forms and boards are seen by respondents—and when free users cost little to serve.
Monthly usage allowance
PostHog states that 97% of companies use it for free and that the free allowance, including one million product-analytics events, renews monthly. The limit is volume. A user pays when usage grows beyond the allowance or when they need advanced features. Editorial inference: a usage allowance converts customers who are growing, but needs infrastructure costs low enough to carry a very large free base.
Sources: [2]
Count limits: sites and channels
Carrd's free plan includes up to three sites with core features and adds a footer badge; Pro starts at $19 per year. Buffer's free plan connects up to three channels, and paid plans charge per channel. A count limit is easy to understand and grows with the customer's own activity. Editorial inference: the third site or fourth channel is a natural moment to ask for payment.
Two more lines: audience size and the second person
Buttondown charges nothing for a newsletter's first 100 subscribers and raises the price as the list grows. Cal.com's individual plan is free with no usage limits, and paid plans start when a team needs collaboration, at $12 per user per month for Teams. These show two further triggers: an audience threshold and the arrival of a second user. Editorial inference: a collaboration trigger tends to arrive with a budget, because a team is now relying on the tool; an audience trigger arrives as the customer's own reach grows. Choose the trigger that coincides with the moment your customer is most likely to have money and a reason to spend it.
How to read a free plan from the outside
When studying a competitor's free plan, record five things: the unit that is limited, the threshold, whether a card is required, whether free output carries branding, and how much history is kept. Simple Analytics, for example, offers a free hobby plan with one month of history and a required badge. Fathom offers no free plan but a 7-day trial that needs a card. Editorial inference: these small terms reveal how a company expects users to convert, and comparing them across competitors shows where a new product could offer a clearer or fairer trigger. Keep the record dated, because free plans change often, and revisit it each quarter to see which competitors tightened or loosened their limits and what that suggests about their costs.
Experiments you can run
Small, falsifiable tests inspired by this case. They are MRRTrace suggestions, not steps the company reported.
Name your upgrade trigger
- Do
- Write one sentence describing the moment a free user should hit a limit, and instrument that event.
- Measure
- Share of users who hit the trigger, and share of those who pay within 14 days.
- Stop if
- Change the limit if fewer than 10% of users who hit it pay within 14 days.
Cost of a free user
- Do
- Calculate monthly infrastructure and support cost per active free account.
- Measure
- Free-user cost divided by revenue per paying account.
- Stop if
- Tighten the free plan if free-user costs exceed 20% of revenue.
Timeline
All six pricing pages checked; free-plan limits recorded as listed.
Source
What to take into your next build
- Compare free plans by the limit that triggers payment.
- Public output (forms, boards, pages) lets free users advertise the product.
- Know the cost of a free user before making the plan generous.
Takeaways are MRRTrace editorial inferences.
Sources
- Tally pricing
- PostHog pricing
- Fider pricing
- Fider homepage
- Carrd Pro pricing
- Buffer pricing
- Senja pricing
- Buttondown pricing
- Cal.com pricing
- Simple Analytics free plan
- Fathom trial terms
This case study combines cited public information and editorial analysis. Outcomes from an established business do not prove that a new entrant can repeat them.