PostPeer

A unified API for connecting social accounts, scheduling content and checking publication results.

Usage-based subscriptions + one-time credit packsDeveloper tools
Visit website
Reported revenue≈ $2,400MRR · Unspecified $Subscription MRR reported in a July 28, 2026 interview; measurement day unspecifiedOriginal disclosure
Business modelUsage-based subscriptions + one-time credit packsDeveloper tools
Profile depthResearched profileProduct facts and editorial breakdown
Source checkedOct 19, 2026Observation date, not revenue cutoff

Business overview

Public positioning

A unified API for connecting social accounts, scheduling content and checking publication results.

How it makes money

Credit-based subscription plans and separate pay-as-you-go purchases; current plans also vary by team capacity.

Business breakdown

Researched Oct 19, 2026

Source-linked product facts, followed by MRRTrace analysis of the customer problem, workflow, trade-offs and questions to test.

The customer problem

PostPeer helps developers add social publishing without creating a separate integration for each supported service. Its official product combines account connection, scheduling and publication interfaces, with additional analytics and engagement capabilities. Editorial interpretation: the paid problem is the repeated operational work around moving approved content to the right account. A buyer still needs a clear content workflow and responsibility for what gets published; a common API does not make those decisions.

Core workflow

  1. Authorize the intended social account and identify its connected account record.
  2. Prepare approved content and send a publication request or a schedule with the correct timezone.
  3. Inspect each platform's outcome and handle failures before treating the campaign as complete.

What customers pay for

Current plans use credits, and the pricing page distinguishes request costs across operations and platforms. Editorial hypothesis: assess economics against successfully delivered customer jobs. A useful pilot would replay a small, representative publishing calendar, including media, different destinations and a failed connection. Measure time saved on setup and recovery, rather than assuming that the number of supported platforms predicts value. Keep occasional usage separate from subscription renewals, because those customers may need different packaging and support.

Distribution signals

Observed channels and entry points; their performance is not inferred.

  • Search-oriented product pages

    Geiger connects an early customer to search groundwork; causality is not established.

    Evidence

Trade-offs

  • Editorial risk: an abstraction simplifies the calling code while leaving platform permissions, media requirements and partial failures to be managed explicitly.
  • Editorial risk: usage pricing can align with customer activity, but expensive operations and support incidents may dominate cost. Test the actual request mix before setting a fixed package.

Open questions

  • Which two platforms create the most repeated integration work for the first paying customer?
  • Can a buyer diagnose a partial publication failure without asking the vendor to inspect every request?

A MRRTrace reading of public product material. Trade-offs and questions are editorial analysis.

Revenue evidence

Founder disclosure in interview
≈ $2,400MRR · Unspecified $ · Subscription MRR reported in a July 28, 2026 interview; measurement day unspecified
Reporting period
Subscription MRR reported in a July 28, 2026 interview; measurement day unspecified
Figure as of
Not provided
Reporting method
Founder disclosure in interview
Source checked
Oct 19, 2026
Source published
Jul 28, 2026

Excludes one-time payments and SocialKit. The combined headline is not this product's MRR. Currency unstated; historical self-report without payment verification.

Jonathan Geiger first-person interview, July 28, 2026
This historical disclosure is separate from any current Stripe connection shown on this page. MRRTrace has not audited the business. Revenue is not profit, and historical figures are not current earnings guarantees.

20 testing credits; subscriptions and PAYG. The displayed Starter annual option is $396/year ($33/month equivalent). Request credit costs vary.

The source page may change its prices, limits, or offer after the recorded check date.

What founders can learn

Editorial notes

Sell a maintained integration layer to customers who already have content and connected-account workflows.

Before you build something similar

  • Support and permissions differ between social platforms.
  • Publishing can succeed on one platform and fail on another.
  • One-time credit purchases are excluded from the recorded MRR.

These are MRRTrace observations, not statements by the founder or proof of a repeatable outcome.

Source material

4 sources
  1. Founder income and team interview Public source · Checked Oct 19, 2026
  2. Official product Public source · Checked Oct 19, 2026
  3. Official pricing Public source · Checked Oct 19, 2026
  4. Official documentation Public source · Checked Oct 19, 2026